[URBANTH-L] Response to Mark
FromYosee at aol.com
FromYosee at aol.com
Sat Apr 30 17:25:34 EDT 2005
Mark,
No one is saying that a study on power relationships of the tourist industry
lacks practical application. It is not the topic, but the abstraction upon
abstraction that post mo encourages that is not useful to our discipline.
Heck, most of us who were steeped in its tradition have a hard time keeping
tract of the focus let alone those in other disciplines.
Yes, language and writing style do matter. In this information age when
info is increasingly becoming available to a larger audience we need to get over
ourselves as an exclusive club guarding sacred knowledge. Using
abstractions that lose readers do nothing to promote anthropology. A study on the
tourist industry with the goal of letting readers know specifically what the
practical applications might be promotes the usefulness of our field. Post mo has
not been concerned about direct application; hence, the term "navel gazing."
Joe
In a message dated 4/29/2005 2:31:18 PM Central Standard Time,
petersm2 at muohio.edu writes:
For many years I have suspected that the term "postmodern" (along with the
term "politically correct") is simply a straw man people construct to burn,
or an epithet that people throw at things they don't like or don't
understand. Joe Ellman's post does nothing to disabuse me of this
notion. What on earth seems "po-mo" or "navel gazing" about cultural
tourism and performance? Or have words like "performance" and "story" just
become anti-"po-mo" red flags producing knee jerk responses?
Tourism circulates as much or more people and more money around the globe
than labor migration, albeit along very different circuits and for
different durations. The recent efforts by IMF and other organizations to
promote tourism as yet another "magic bullet" has led states to put
increased pressure on their "indigenous" groups to market and display
themselves for touristic consumption. Under these pressures, ritual
performances are broken free of their local life cycle patterns, social
structures, agricultural cycles and religious calendars, with enormous
consequences for local social and cultural transformation. Economies,
politics, belief systems--everything is potentially affected. Ironically
(oops--another po-mo red flag word), even as indigenous groups seek to
market "authenticity" to foreigners, as a result of those efforts the
problem of authenticity arises in the local community as ritual becomes
increasingly a scripted "performance". In some communities, rituals are
transformed and important intergenerational cultural realities are lost,
traded for tourist dollars. In other cases, revivals are occurring. For
example, in Malta the willingness of tourists to pay to watch "medieval"
Catholic pageants has reawakened interest in these rites among the middle
classes, whose educations for decades have taught them to ignore them.
Social change, community, social structure, economic adaptation,
ritual--there's nothing "po-mo" or esoteric in any of this. Nor is there
anything unreal about the millions of Americans and Europeans and Asians
who will pay for cultural tourism, creating the engine that generates the
performances. And there are jobs in it. Cultural tourism is financed by
many development agencies. So you can use your anthropological knowledge to
be selling authenticity or assisting local communities to adapt to economic
conditions while minimizing cultural loss, or both, depending on your
ethical standards.
Frankly, I think it sounds like a great conference and I'm sorry I'll be in
North Africa and have to give it a miss.
Mark
Mark Allen Peterson
Asst Prof of Anthropology and International Studies
152 Upham Hall
Miami University
Oxford, OH 45056
tel: 513 529-5018
fax: 513 529-8396
e-mail: petersm2 at muohio.edu
More information about the URBANTH-L
mailing list