[URBANTH-L]ANN: Cosmopolitanism and Anthropology (Keele, UK)
Angela Jancius
acjancius at ysu.edu
Wed Mar 22 02:04:04 EST 2006
Cosmopolitanism and Anthropology
10th - 13th April 2006 (Monday-Thursday), University of Keele, UK
http://www.theasa.org/asa06/index.html
ASA 2006 Diamond Jubilee
Keynote speakers to include Stuart Hall, Andre Beteille and Elizabeth
Colson.
Plenary speakers and chairs: Joel Kahn, Jonathan Friedman, Richard Fardon,
Richard Werbner, Chris Hann, Marilyn Strathern, Richard Wilson, Birgit
Meyer, Bruce Kapferer, Jonathan Parry, Alan Macfarlane, David Graeber.
Conference venue:
Keele University is located in the Staffordshire countryside. The University
has excellent conference facilities in a rural setting (it was voted best in
the country for several years recently). The inclusive price for the
conference, including full board and ensuite accommodation, is approximately
£250, but is given in detail on the Registration form.
Main themes:
Anthropology as a cosmopolitan discipline
Normative cosmopolitanism (human rights, global justice, global
governmentality, NGOs etc.)
'Rooted' Cosmopolitanism
Cosmpolitan spaces (cities, artworlds, pilgrimage centres, factories, mines,
etc.)
Elite versus demotic cosmopolitanism (especially in the postcolony)
Cosmopolitan institutions (e.g. museums)
Globalisation, cosmopolitanism and cultural hybridity (migration, diaspora,
occupational travellers, pilgrims, popular culture).
Cosmopolitan subjectivity/consciousness
In the past decade, debates on cosmopolitanism have engaged a wide range of
disciplines, from political theory to sociology, critical studies and social
history. The multiplication of collections, edited journal issues and
readers reflects this growing centrality of the topic in the social
sciences, as does the list of leading theorists intervening in the debate
from different disciplinary perspectives. Among these, anthropologists have
made from the start original contributions (beginning with Ulf Hannerz, the
list is growing and includes, among others, Adam Kuper, James Clifford,
Arjun Appadurai, Richard Werbner, Jonathan Friedman, Bruno Latour, Aiwa Ong,
Paul Rabinow, Joel Kahn, Pnina Werbner and Steven Vertovec).
Moving away from the dominant stress in globalisation theory on financial
and media flows, contemporary theorisations of cosmopolitanism reflect upon
globalisation from an aesthetic and moral perspective. One tendency has been
to think of cosmopolitanism as transgressing the parochialism or ethnicism
of the nation-state. In this view, cosmopolitans are travellers who move
beyond national boundaries, and hence a cosmopolitan social science must
study these flows and movements, or reflect on issues of global justice,
human rights and governmentality. This apparently commonsensical view has
been challenged, however, in a deservedly much cited article by Kwame
Anthony Appiah, 'Cosmopolitan Patriots', in which he argues that
cosmopolitanism is equally an argument within postcolonial states on
citizenship, equal dignity, cultural rights and the rule of law. Appiah
speaks of a 'rooted' cosmopolitanism, and proposes that cosmopolitans begin
from membership in morally and emotionally significant communities
(families, ethnic groups) while espousing notions of toleration and openness
to the world, the transcendance of ethnic difference and the moral
incorporation of the other. His vision opens up scope for a cosmopolitan
anthropology which builds on anthropological strengths of fieldwork in
particular locales.
Can there be a cosmopolitan anthropology? One central aim of the conference
is to reflect back in order to consider the place and contribution of
British and Commonwealth anthropology to current debates on cosmopolitanism
and cosmopolitans. An argument can be put that anthropology has always been
a cosmopolitan social science par excellence. Hence, Kuper has argued
against postmodern critiques of anthropology that we should aspire to
contribute 'a comparative dimension to the enlightenment project of a
science of human variation in time and space. Our object must be to confront
the models current in the social sciences with the experiences and models of
our subjects, while insisting that this should be a two-way process'
(1994:551).
In this spirit, one aim of the conference will be to interrogate critically
a historiography of modern British social anthropology that has challenged -
as being western and hegemonic - British anthropology's cosmopolitan
engagement with the 'other', and its discursive articulation by metropolitan
anthropologists. A further aim might be to question critically the view that
imputes to British social anthropology a narrow focus on closed cultures and
restricted locales. One has only to think of the many studies of
cross-ethnic engagement by the founding generation of British social
anthropology, from Malinowski's study of kula, to Nadel's study of a
multi-ethnic state, Fortes's study of Tallensi ritual extensions beyond the
local, Schapera's study of civic incorporation of strangers among Tswana,
Evans-Pritchard's Nuer-Dinka encounter or Leach's complex model of Highland
Burma. Such examples can be multiplied, and include the extensive studies of
modern colonial towns, urban ethnicity, mines in Central Africa, regional
cults, trading diasporas, ethnogenesis, Christian churches, anti-witchcraft
movements, etc., which all point to the gross distortion of the history of
social anthropology that has been perpetrated on the subject by its critics.
Convenors
Prof Pnina Werbner, University of Keele
E: P.Werbner at keele.ac.uk
Organiser: Sean McLoughlin, Leeds University
E: conference at theasa.org
Please send all communication regarding the conference to
conference at theasa.org
More information about the URBANTH-L
mailing list