[URBANTH-L]
REV: Mughal on Day and Masciulli, Globalization and Political Ethics
Angela Jancius
jancius3022 at comcast.net
Fri Nov 7 11:24:31 EST 2008
Anthropology Review Database. BOOK REVIEW
http://wings.buffalo.edu/ARD/cgi/showme.cgi?keycode=3054
Day , Richard B. & Joseph Masciulli. 2007 Globalization and Political
Ethics: International Studies in Sociology and Social Anthropology. Leiden;
Boston: Brill.
Reviewed 24 Oct 2008 by Muhammad Aurang Zeb Mughal <zebi_anthro at yahoo.com>,
Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Richard B. Day (University of Toronto) and Joseph Masciulli (St. Thomas
University), introduce Globalization and Political Ethics as a demonstration
of the subjectivity of the term "globalization" with reference to the
underlying political ethics and evaluate it in normative terms rather than
as an objective prospect or in the language of economic science, where
"value" has a "price" (p.ix).
Globalization and Political Ethics comprises fifteen essays that
examine the crucial issues of a globalizing world such as terrorism,
institutional change, the configuration of the world economy, the role of
the United Nations and international financial institutions, the regimes of
international trade and technology transfer, the effects of regionalism in
the European Union and Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the failure
of Russia, and genocide and state-induced famines in Africa, all under the
microscope of political ethics. Day and Masciulli look into the connection
between globalization and ethics within a culture facing globalization
elucidating the link between ethics and market through philosophical tools
like Aristotle's arguments on ethical life in the city-state, state-centered
Hegelian ethics, and the universal-cosmopolitan claims of Kantian morality.
The book not only searches the prospects for global governance but also
explains why there is a great need to institutionalize the markets at
various levels of social organizations, as Habermas thinks, so that people
can define market and society in their own terms.
The authors are of the opinion that there are asymmetrical implications
of the so-called universal economy due to the dominance of developed
countries over the developing countries. They try to convince the reader
that the trade and technology policies of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
and its agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS) exist just to gratify the interests of Western powers and that both
of these are hurdles in the way of development of the third world (p.129).
The book argues that globalization has played havoc with Russia because its
post-communist global economy is largely dictated by the West, and rejects
the neo-liberal economists' claim that globalization provides economic
efficiency and human enlightenment (p.175).
Globalization and Political Ethics, while discussing regionalism,
stresses it is unclear whether the foundation of the European Union has
ended barriers to the movement of labor, goods and capital across borders,
as Europe has been in the front line of favoring "globalization", or whether
it aims to protect Europe's cultural identity and to save itself from the
destructive pressures of globalization (p. 185). On the other hand, there
are some who claim the EU is an ethical undertaking and a denial of market
fundamentalism (p. 212) choosing the market economy instead of market
society (p.210). Quoting ASEAN, the book stresses that humanitarian
intervention, even if well intentioned, has a mammoth potential to be abused
(p.233).
The book presents open criticism of the genocide and state-induced
famine in Africa blaming the West especially for colonial genocide in
South-West Africa and Congo, and asks for more attention to such issues in
Africa as part of our global ethics (p.242). It admires the role of the UN
in security related issues beyond interstate relations (p.267 & 288) and
also encourages cooperation and understanding in the fight against
terrorism, conferring certain theoretical issues like relative universality
of human rights and the prospects for global governance, keeping in view the
shared risks to humanity.
The selection of these topics narrows the book's focus to issues that
are controversial from an ethical point of view and might have undermined
the positive and moral aspects of globalization. For instance, a world
without international unions and organizations could reflect a different
situation as far as political ethics are considered, and that is why the
volume markedly evaluates the impact of globalization, concluding, not
always positively, on social justice, and judges the forces bringing
globalization using political and historical facts to balance the
philosophical ideals, and suggests models for the implications of political
ethics in practice under the umbrella of globalization through the dialogue
of political theory and international relations (p.391).
At the end, the book gives hope for a better future for humanity
through global governance fulfilling moral needs. It is a precious work that
may help research and academic endeavors in the international politics and
those interested in the moral aspects of change.
More information about the URBANTH-L
mailing list